Alcumus SafeWorkforce
Alcumus SafeWorkforce
Psychosocial risk is no longer emerging; it is already one of the leading causes of harm at work, and many organisations are not managing it effectively. From chronic stress and burnout to fatigue-driven errors increasingly influencing both wellbeing and safety outcomes, often in ways organisations are not measuring or managing.
The latest International Labour Organization’s (ILO) World Safety and Health Day 2026 report reinforces the scale of this shift, bringing psychosocial risk firmly into focus as a critical challenge for organisations worldwide.
Off the back of this, we sat down with our experts, Matthew Rouse, Managing Director of SafeWorkforce and SafeHR, and Claire Thompson, Health and Safety Consultant at SafeWorkforce, to explore what this means in practice and why health and safety functions must evolve beyond traditional approaches.
For decades, safety has been defined by physical hazards. But today, some of the most serious risks are less visible and organisations that fail to recognise them are leaving a critical gap in their safety strategy.
According to the ILO, these risks are linked to over 840,000 deaths annually, alongside nearly 45 million years of healthy life lost. The economic impact is equally significant, with an estimated 1.37% of global GDP attributed to psychosocial factors.
In the UK, the data tells a similar story. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) reports that 1.9 million workers are experiencing work-related ill health, with stress, depression and anxiety accounting for a substantial proportion of cases. The resulting loss of over 40 million working days each year highlights the scale of the issue, not just in human terms, but in operational and financial impact.
For organisations, this means these risks are already impacting productivity, absence, and incident rates, whether they are being measured or not.
What this makes clear is that psychosocial risk is no longer separate from traditional health and safety concerns; it is part of the same risk landscape.
Despite this, many organisations are still approaching safety as a compliance exercise, rather than a tool to actively reduce risk.
Risk assessments are completed, reports are documented, and compliance requirements are met. However, the focus can too often remain on satisfying external expectations, rather than genuinely reducing risk.
Matt Rouse explains:
“Don’t make safety a tick box exercise… because if you do, you’re missing the point.” In practice, this means moving beyond completing risk assessments to actively reviewing whether they are changing behaviours on the ground.
When safety becomes a process to complete rather than a principle to embed, the outcome is predictable, risks persist, even when systems appear to be in place.
This is one of the most common challenges organisations face.
Many already have occupational health programmes, monitoring systems, and structured processes. Yet employees continue to experience stress, fatigue, and related health issues. In some cases, near misses, accidents and incidents still occur, often linked to factors such as workload, communication, or lack of support.
Claire Thompson highlights the issue clearly:
“If your workers are still suffering… you’ve got to figure out why. What is it within your process that is causing that?”
This reflects a critical shift in thinking. It is not enough to have systems in place; the focus must be on whether those systems are actually delivering the intended outcomes.
On the ground, psychosocial risk rarely appears as a single, clearly defined issue. Instead, it emerges through patterns and behaviours over time.
It can be seen in teams operating under constant time pressure, where deadlines leave little room for error or recovery. It can show up in fatigue-related near misses, where concentration and decision-making are affected. In other cases, it appears as inconsistent supervision, unclear processes, or a lack of communication between teams.
These are not isolated incidents. They are early indicators of underlying issues in how work is organised and managed and recognising them early is key to prevention.
For example, a team consistently working under unrealistic deadlines may not raise a formal issue, but the resulting fatigue and errors are clear indicators of risk.
A common thread across many organisations is a disconnect between process and practice.
Without clear ownership, identified risks often remain unaddressed. Where it is considered, it may not be fully integrated into existing safety systems.
Data may be collected but not always analysed in a way that drives action. Responsibilities can remain unclear, leading to situations where risks are identified but not owned.
As Matthew Rouse is clear on the consequences of this:
“Somebody has to take responsibility for that. The business has to take responsibility.”
Without clear accountability, even well-designed systems struggle to deliver real-world impact.
For SMEs, these challenges can be even more pronounced.
Smaller organisations often operate with limited resources and less formalised systems. Health and safety responsibilities may sit alongside other roles, making it harder to dedicate time and focus to emerging risks.
At the same time, the impact of any issue is amplified. A single incident, or the absence of a key team member, can disrupt operations significantly. This creates a level of exposure that is often underestimated.
As a result, SMEs benefit most from approaches that are practical, proportionate, and easy to implement, rather than complex systems that are difficult to sustain. If you’re an SME, this often means health and safety sits alongside other responsibilities, making it harder to focus on emerging risks.
The regulatory landscape is also evolving.
The HSE has placed increasing emphasis on work-related stress and psychosocial risk, reinforcing that these must be managed in the same way as any other workplace hazard. Through its Working Minds campaign, organisations are being encouraged to take a more proactive, preventative approach.
This includes recognising early signs of stress, responding appropriately, and embedding ongoing review into everyday management practices. The emphasis is on making this part of routine operations, rather than a one-off exercise.
What this signals is a broader shift, from guidance to expectation and organisations are increasingly expected to demonstrate how they are managing it.
For many organisations, the starting point is not about introducing entirely new systems, but about building on what is already in place.
This might involve expanding existing risk assessments to include psychosocial factors or taking a closer look at trends within current data. In many cases, the key is simplicity, ensuring that processes are clear, practical, and consistently applied.
In practice, this could mean:
As Matt Rouse notes:
“If they’re simple, they’ll get done.”
That principle is particularly important for SMEs, where time and resource constraints mean that overly complex approaches are unlikely to be effective.
One of the clearest takeaways is that psychosocial risk is not something organisations can afford to ignore or delay addressing.
Claire Thompson puts it simply:
“Don’t just put your head in the sand… It’s not going anywhere. It’s here to stay.”
With increasing regulatory focus, shifting workforce expectations, and new generations entering the workplace, this is an issue that will only continue to grow in importance. Waiting for problems to surface is no longer a viable approach.
Get in touch for expert advice or book a demo to see how SafeWorkforce can support your business.
Related Insights
